Publication Ethics | Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة

Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة adheres to the highest ethical standards in the publishing process, ensuring that all stakeholders—authors, reviewers, editors, and the editorial board—maintain the integrity and transparency of the journal. Our publication ethics are guided by internationally recognized standards and principles, which are aimed at ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability in the publishing process.

1. Ethical Responsibilities of Authors:

Originality and Plagiarism:

Authors must submit only original works that have not been previously published or simultaneously submitted elsewhere.
Proper citation of all sources is required, including direct quotations, paraphrased text, and any other content not originally created by the author.
Authors must avoid plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and falsifying data. If plagiarism is identified at any stage of the submission or after publication, appropriate action will be taken, including possible rejection of the manuscript or retraction of the article.

Authorship and Acknowledgments:

Authors must ensure that all individuals who have made substantial contributions to the research are appropriately acknowledged as co-authors.
The corresponding author must ensure that all co-authors have approved the manuscript and its contents before submission.
Acknowledgment of funding sources, contributions, and any other support received during the research process is required.

Conflict of Interest:

Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research or publication of their manuscript. This includes financial support, personal relationships, or any other factors that may pose a conflict.
Conflicts of interest must be disclosed at the time of manuscript submission, and authors are responsible for keeping this information updated throughout the review and publication process.

Data and Results Accuracy:

Authors must present their research results clearly, honestly, and accurately. The data should not be manipulated or fabricated to fit the desired outcomes.
If errors are found after publication, authors must promptly notify the journal and work with the editorial team to correct or retract the article, as necessary.

Ethical Approval:

If the research involves human participants, animals, or any other ethical concerns, authors must ensure that the study received ethical approval from an appropriate committee or institution.
The authors must include a statement in the manuscript about the ethical approval of the study and provide details regarding consent if applicable.

2. Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers:

Confidentiality:

Reviewers must treat all manuscripts under review as confidential. They should not share, discuss, or use the content of the manuscript for personal or professional gain.

Objectivity and Fairness:

Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts objectively, without bias or prejudice based on the authors’ affiliations, personal relationships, or opinions. They should assess the manuscript based solely on its scientific and academic merit.

Constructive Feedback:

Reviewers should provide constructive feedback to authors, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Feedback should be clear, polite, and helpful.

Conflict of Interest:

Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect their ability to review the manuscript objectively. If a conflict exists, the reviewer must recuse themselves from the review process.

Promptness:

Reviewers must return their reviews within the specified time frame. If a reviewer is unable to meet the deadline, they should notify the editor as soon as possible.

Ethical Concerns:

If a reviewer suspects any ethical issues, such as plagiarism, fraudulent data, or unethical research practices, they must report these concerns to the editor. Reviewers should also inform the editor of any content that may have been published elsewhere.

3. Ethical Responsibilities of Editors:

Decision Making:

Editors are responsible for making publication decisions based on the quality, relevance, and ethical standards of the submitted manuscript. Decisions must be made fairly and without bias, based solely on the manuscript’s merit and adherence to ethical standards.

Fairness and Transparency:

Editors must ensure that all manuscripts are handled impartially and are treated with equal consideration. The review process should be transparent, with authors receiving clear feedback from reviewers.

Conflict of Interest:

Editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and recuse themselves from the decision-making process if such a conflict exists. Editors must avoid any personal or financial interests that could influence their editorial decisions.

Protecting Intellectual Property:

Editors must ensure that manuscripts submitted for review are protected from unauthorized access or misuse. They must respect the intellectual property rights of authors and reviewers.

Handling Complaints and Appeals:

Editors must address any ethical issues, complaints, or appeals regarding manuscripts in a transparent, fair, and timely manner. If necessary, they should work with the editorial board to resolve conflicts or disputes.

Post-Publication Corrections and Retractions:

Editors must be proactive in identifying and addressing issues such as plagiarism, conflicts of interest, or errors in published manuscripts. In cases where a correction, retraction, or clarification is needed, the editor should initiate the appropriate action in a timely manner.

Ethical Approval and Human/Animal Research:

Editors must ensure that manuscripts involving human or animal research comply with ethical guidelines and have received the necessary ethical approval. If there are concerns about ethical violations, the manuscript should be rejected or withdrawn.

4. Ethical Responsibilities of the Editorial Board:

Policy Development:

The editorial board is responsible for developing, maintaining, and updating the journal’s publication ethics and policies, ensuring they align with global standards of academic integrity.

Promoting Integrity:

The editorial board ensures that ethical issues in publication are handled with integrity, transparency, and fairness. They should also support efforts to prevent unethical practices such as plagiarism and fabrication of data.

Ensuring Diversity and Inclusion:

The editorial board works to promote diversity and inclusion in all aspects of the journal, including its editorial processes, authorship, and review panels.

5. Ethical Issues in Publishing:

a) Plagiarism and Falsification:

Plagiarism and data falsification are serious ethical violations. Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة will take appropriate action if plagiarism or other unethical practices are identified, including retraction of articles and reporting the issue to the author’s institution or relevant authorities.

Duplicate Publication:

Authors should not submit manuscripts that have been published or are under review elsewhere. Manuscripts found to be duplicate submissions will be rejected, and appropriate action will be taken if duplicate publications are detected.

Article Retractions and Corrections:

If an article contains significant errors or ethical concerns after publication, Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة will issue a correction or retraction, depending on the nature of the issue. Authors are expected to cooperate with the journal in addressing such concerns.

6. Complaints and Appeals:

If authors, reviewers, or any other stakeholders have complaints or concerns about ethical practices within the journal, they should contact the editorial team. The journal will address complaints regarding plagiarism, conflicts of interest, or any other ethical concerns in a transparent, fair, and timely manner.

7. Commitment to Ethical Publishing:

Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of academic ethics and integrity in its publishing practices. We strive to create a publishing environment that fosters scholarly research, promotes open dialogue, and maintains the credibility of the academic community. All authors, reviewers, editors, and the editorial board are expected to adhere to these principles to ensure the quality and ethical standards of the journal.