Peer Review Policy

 

At Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة, we uphold a rigorous and transparent peer review process to maintain the highest standards of academic excellence. The peer review process is fundamental to ensuring the quality, relevance, and integrity of the research we publish. Below is an outline of our peer review policy:

  1. Peer Review Process:

All manuscripts submitted to Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة undergo a double-blind peer review process. In this process:

  • Double-Blind Review: Both the identities of the authors and reviewers are kept confidential throughout the review process. Authors do not know the identity of the reviewers, and reviewers do not know the identity of the authors.
  • Reviewer Selection: Manuscripts are reviewed by at least two independent experts in the relevant field of study. Reviewers are selected based on their expertise, reputation, and knowledge in the subject area of the manuscript.
  • Initial Screening: The editorial team conducts an initial screening to ensure that the submitted manuscript aligns with the journal’s scope and quality standards. If a manuscript does not meet these criteria, it may be rejected before peer review.
  1. Review Criteria:

Reviewers are asked to evaluate the manuscript based on the following criteria:

  • Originality and Significance: Does the manuscript contribute new knowledge to the field? Is the research original and relevant to the journal’s scope?
  • Methodology: Are the research methods robust, appropriate, and clearly described? Are the results valid and reliable?
  • Clarity and Structure: Is the manuscript clearly written, logically structured, and easy to understand? Does the manuscript follow the journal’s formatting guidelines?
  • References and Citations: Are the sources cited in the manuscript appropriate and relevant? Are they current and accurately referenced?
  • Ethical Considerations: Has the manuscript adhered to ethical guidelines, such as informed consent, conflicts of interest, and research integrity?
  1. Decision-Making Process:
  • Review Outcome: After receiving feedback from the reviewers, the editor will make one of the following decisions:
    • Accept: The manuscript is accepted without changes.
    • Minor Revisions: The manuscript is accepted with minor revisions, which should be addressed promptly by the author.
    • Major Revisions: The manuscript requires significant changes, and a revised version should be submitted.
    • Reject: The manuscript is not suitable for publication in the journal.
  • Revisions: Authors are given a reasonable amount of time to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer comments. Revised manuscripts are re-evaluated by the editorial team, and, if necessary, sent back to the original reviewers for further assessment.
  1. Confidentiality:

All information about manuscripts under review is considered confidential. Reviewers, editors, and authors must not share or disclose any details about the manuscript or its contents to any third parties. Any conflicts of interest must be disclosed prior to reviewing or editing.

  1. Ethical Guidelines:
  • Plagiarism Check: All submitted manuscripts undergo a plagiarism detection process. Submissions found to contain plagiarized content will be rejected immediately.
  • Conflicts of Interest: Authors, reviewers, and editors are required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest that might influence the review process. If a conflict arises, the affected individual must recuse themselves from the process.
  • Handling of Sensitive Data: Reviewers must respect the confidentiality of any sensitive data included in the manuscript. They must not use any information obtained during the review process for personal gain or publish it elsewhere.
  1. Post-Publication Peer Review:

Even after publication, Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة allows for ongoing peer review and encourages readers to submit comments or critiques of published articles. We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly dialogue and will consider retractions or corrections if warranted.

  1. Transparency and Accountability:

The editorial team at Al-Bayyinaẗ. البينة is committed to transparency in the peer review process. We provide authors and reviewers with clear guidelines to ensure that the process is fair, consistent, and objective. Authors will receive constructive feedback to improve their work, and reviewers will be acknowledged for their contributions.

  1. Reviewer Responsibilities:

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Provide an unbiased and honest assessment of the manuscript.
  • Offer constructive feedback to help authors improve their work.
  • Evaluate the manuscript based on its merits, not personal biases or affiliations.
  • Maintain confidentiality and avoid conflicts of interest.
  1. Author Responsibilities:

Authors are expected to:

  • Ensure their manuscript is original, with proper citations for all referenced works.
  • Respond to reviewer comments in a timely and respectful manner.
  • Make necessary revisions to improve the clarity and quality of the manuscript.